Whether this was a correct decision at that time or not (and whether Wikipedia guidelines may have changed in the meantime or not), for the sake of consistency, a change in capitalization here ought necessarily to entail a wholesale change of work titles in those two articles, at least.- Jerome Kohl ( talk) 17:31, 5 April 2010 (UTC) However, this and all other Portuguese titles of Villa-Lobos's works, both in the main article Heitor Villa-Lobos and in the List of compositions by Heitor Villa-Lobos, were changed two or three years ago to reflect Portuguese rules of capitalization (and, in the case of titles of some other works, orthography reforms put in place since the original publications of the scores). Current Wikipedia guidelines state that capitalization of foreign titles should reflect the usual practice in English-language sources. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
#VILLA LOBOS BACHIANAS BRASILEIRAS 5 IMSLP FREE#
Cgingold ( talk) 08:00, 5 April 2010 (UTC) Survey Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Ron hjones (Talk) 01:00, 13 April 2010 (UTC)īachianas brasileiras → Bachianas Brasileiras - My search of Google Scholar in both English & Portguese clearly indicates that capitalization of both words is prevalent.
![villa lobos bachianas brasileiras 5 imslp villa lobos bachianas brasileiras 5 imslp](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/LaNoiKuJFQg/maxresdefault.jpg)
The result of the move request was: page moved.
![villa lobos bachianas brasileiras 5 imslp villa lobos bachianas brasileiras 5 imslp](https://i.pinimg.com/736x/64/28/93/642893f4b7a184a8ddd5986da28bc2b7.jpg)
No further edits should be made to this section. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move.